Citizen's Blog

Wednesday, November 04, 2009

M'sia refuses to release Bibles
Posted by: klyong2502
Why i can't see Star publishing this piece of news? They seem to be so busy demonizing PR and glorifying BN. If you can't deliver the truth, minus well just scrap... 

KUALA LUMPUR - THE Malaysian government has refused to release 10,000 Bibles confiscated for using the word 'Allah' to refer to God, a banned translation in Christian texts in this Muslim-majority country, an official said on Wednesday.

An official from the Home Ministry's publications unit said the government rejected pleas by church officials to allow the Bibles, imported from Indonesia, into the country. Christians say the Muslim Malay-dominated government is violating their right to practice their religion freely.

Such religious disputes are undermining Malaysia's reputation as a harmonious multiethnic, moderate Muslim nation. About 30 percent of the country's 28 million people practice Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism or other faiths.

A Home Ministry official said the government told the importer last month to return the Indonesian-language Bibles, which are still with customs.

'Actually the publications, the Bibles are already banned,' said the official, refusing to elaborate. He declined to be named because he is not authorised to make public statements.

The Bibles contain the word 'Allah,' which is banned by the government for use by non-Muslims in an apparent bid to appease Muslims. Church officials say the word 'Allah' has been used for centuries to refer generally to God in both Indonesian and Malaysian languages, which are similar. The Roman Catholic Church is challenging the ban in court. AP

Comments

this paper is also one of those BN cronies!!! Useless!
Boycott It!
Ahem:

Authorities asked to release 15,000 seized Bibles

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/11/4/nation/20091104132939&sec=nation

The Star may miss it the first time, but we do follow up even so. I suggest you stay tuned to http://thestar.com.my/ as much as possible; cheers.
If so, why cant the The Roman Catholic Church just get the Bible from elsewhere, must it be from Indonesia. Did we not just got a message from them of being a copy cat.

As for our local 'Enlightened Beings', biasalah...

"Anak dirumah mati kebuluran, Kera dihutan disusukan"

(1) In the Indonesian Bible Yohanes 3:16 (John 3:16) is as follows:

"Karena begitu besar kasih Allah akan dunia ini, sehingga Ia telah mengaruniakan Anak-Nya yang tunggal, supaya setiap orang yang percaya kepada-Nya tidak binasa, melainkan beroleh hidup yang kekal."

(2) There are many English versions of the Bible but the following is the one from the Douay-Rheims Bible where John 3:16 is stated as follows:

"For God so loved the world, as to give his only begotten Son: that whosoever believeth in him may not perish, but may have life everlasting."

(3) Can someone clarify: If indeed Allah is the name of the God of the Christians, why isn't Allah used in the English versions of the Bible as well?
The Bible had been translated into different languages. Therefore, God has many different translated names (or version)... In Asia, Europe, Middle Eastern, Oceanic, and America... (or Greek Latin whatever) you name it...

In addition, there is no restriction imposed on Christian/believers that, in order to study the Bible it has to be of the original language... so, having an unlimited term for God is not surprising, as long as it agrees with the context (and content).

Even Chinese (or Japanese) version of Bible has its own description (or term) for God.

If you look closely at the etymology of the term "Allah", you will think that it's ridiculous to claim sole ownership of the word "Allah" in a religion. The term "Allah" had been used even during the Abrahamic era (and by Pagans as well) and it's rather more cultural (Arabic) than religious.

In our case, I think the Ministry is worried about the maturity of certain people, and hence the ban is to present these people from foolishly misread and believe in other text... But are we that childish?
Logically, in English, God is used. In Malay (in the context of Nusantara), can either use Tuhan or Allah (though the latter is only adopted in 15th century? - hence the incorporation of Allah as God in the language), in Chinese, "Shang-Ti" or "Ju" denotes God, in Japanese, I don't really know as I don't speak that language, in Hindi.... it might be in a Hindi word...

It would be weird to have a jumbled out translated version of "Ju" (Chinese) in English Bible, and vice versa.... hence, Allah in English bible is a bit off... though it can still be incorporated. But writing a chinese character (Shang Ti) in English bible will raise eyebrow...
Thanks asohan for the link. The article was just written today at about 1 pm and it is not even in today's paper. Just for your information, this is the follow up article by Singapore Strait Times. The first article came out about two days ago. Interestingly, some Malaysian related reported incidences were not published [or essential information withdrawn] in the Star as well, in case you didn't know...
Soondar wrote: "Can someone clarify: If indeed Allah is the name of the God of the Christians, why isn't Allah used in the English versions of the Bible as well?" I would like to believe you are above average blogger but judging by your comments you are indeed an ‘out of the box’ boggler! I don’t know how you got the 1st and 2nd scripts correct and your 3rd is just the opposite. Allah is not the name of the God of the Christian… Allah is an Arabic term for God. In English is God. Allah is God or God is Allah and Tuhan in Bahasa Melayu. P.S. The seizure made by the authorities isn’t about where it comes from but solely because of the word “Allah” used in the Bible. I suggest the gomen initiate 1Malaysia Language!
soondar,

That is a pertinent question indeed. For other prophets that are recognised in both the Bible and the Quran, they both have the same name.

Isa has Christ. Musa has Moses. Ibrahim has Abraham and so on.

If Tuhan is God, then what is the Bible equivalent of Allah?

However, at the end of the day, religion is a personal affair. Perhaps even more personal than that between a man and woman in deep love.

As such, we should all respect each others belief and religious rules. It is only polite to refrain from any activity or words that serves no other purpose than to provoke the other party, regardless of the justifications.

It is not possible to be "logical" when it comes to faith.

Ahimsa and Om Mani Padme Hum to all.
Guys, let God be the judge for this matter. No point debating.

Soondar, I respect most of your comments so far, but I totally lost it when I read your 3rd point.I really cannot understand how could you come up with such a foolish question.
in my opinion, the word Allah is a general references in Bahasa to God, and just because the Quran has it, then others should not?

hey dey gomen, you think you own bahasa is it?
"If Tuhan is God, then what is the Bible equivalent of Allah?" Pi mai The answer is "GOD". If it is the Kitab Injil, the term used is Allah (the very topic of discussion now). If it is just Kitab, the term used is Tuhan :) P.S. Bahasa Melayu is ALLAH and Bahasa Malaysia is TUHAN. Ya Allah Ya Tuhanku... Selamatkan bangsaku dari durhaka dan durjana.
PatrickJB, JASS222058,

(1) Just like any other religion, Christians do have a name for their God. Read Genesis 1.1 in the Hebrew language.

(2) One more question for the two of you and also to any one aho knows the answer(s): On Judgement Day, what are the names Christians should use to refer to their God? Should it be Elohim and Yeshua or can it be any equivalent of the word god in any language? In your replies, quote the related proofs from your Bible. Don't get me wrong. These are not challenges, these are questions.

So, don't get angry and call others silly and foolish and etc, etc, etc. They are valid questions about a subject called Faith. Also, aren't Christians obliged to answer such questions from people who want to know the answers? Shouldn't answering questions be considered as part of the inter-faith dialogue process?
I believe that Allah is indeed an Arabic term for God, but Allah is used in exclusive reference to God. There is another word for God, Rabb, which can be used to refer to God generally. The closest synonymous English translation of Rabb is Lord, which is a common name for God in English-language (or Latin) Bible as well. Perhaps we can all settle down for Rabb or Tuhan, if we really want to cool this issue down.
William P Young in his book "The Shack" said among other things about the social ills of man today, ".....because you are only seeing the institution, a man-made system. That's not what God built this world to be... it's about the people and their lives, a living breathing community of all those who love... not buildings and programs... it's about relationships and simply sharing life."
Fancy fighting for the right just to call God the Almighty.
It's a case of small man BIG GOD!
Peace!
what for this matter only, i thought we should let God be the judge of all matters,so you guys no need to make so much fuss & noise! Wasting time blogging!
Just wait until kingdom come la!
Soondar,
your question is not a question but an insult.

Do you think Muslim will accept it if we make comment on the Quran?

And do you think the muslim will like it if the quran is banned or seized just because of one particular 'WORD'.

Inter faith mean all the religions should have a good understanding and there should be no one religion can say that it is the right one and it is the only one who can use the word Allah.

The indonesian has been using this word for years and have you heard anyone in Indonesia complaining about this? or have you heard the ARABS, which is the origin of the word complaining about other religion using it?

I'm sorry but I feel that foolish is the only word to describe your question so don't get agitated when someone make such description of such a stupid and insulting question.
Alright, maybe just simple fact to me,

Buddha is my teacher.
Buddhism is my teaching.

Buddha taught us, everything is a cycle of life. Everyhting difference is creation of man.

If we are sharing, yes name is just name, word is just a word, it is meant to be shared.

Buddha told us, he is not god.
JASS222058,

Thank you for your angry reply from which I can conclude that (1) you do not know why the word Allah should not/cannot be used in the english versions of the Bible and (2) you do not know by what name christians should address their god in the after-death world. But, let's see if your friend PatrickJB and others can shed some light on the two issues. Hang around, you may learn something new from them.


Hi there,


I don't belong to any religion.

So I am not in any position to quote the Koran or the Bible.

Why everyone trying to say "God" belongs to Christianity or Allah belongs to Islam?

Maybe they are one and the same...maybe there is God/A;;ah and maybe there is none.

Look at the websites on Atheism- USA has a huge population of atheists. They even have their national association.

The argument is that if there is God/Allah, how come so many good people are killed, murdered, died in accidents etc. Where is God/Allah when they cry for help?

Buddhists will say that this is karma. Then we have so many Tibetan monks who claim that they are reincarnations of famous spiritual teachers etc.

I do not wish to condemn, question (like soondar) too far- as the universer is so big. We all actually know NUTS and all so tiny when compared to the universe.

Anyway, Islam is getting a bad name these days- what with militants and terrorists- the Talibans destroying the big statue of Buddha in Afghanistan.

Back to the subject- I feel the government is wrong to ban the Christian books. It gives Islam another bad image as an intolerant religion.
JASS222058, my 10 'fingers' for you man... give this guy your 5 'toes'! For all you know, I am behind you. By the way do you need my blowpipe?
Soondar, you may like to read this: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2009/10/29/church-officials-15000-bibles-seized-malaysia.html
PatrickJB, We already know that story. Read asohan's comments (4-Nov-2009).
Does God need a name? Does HE? HE is the great "I AM" and "HE WAS, HE IS and HE WILL BE."
When I meet HIM I will just call HIM "FATHER!"
Soondar,

I'm not angry but this is my way of emphasizing the truth.

Please ask yourself why only in our country things like this is happening?

The Quran was written by man. The Bibles also written by man. And now man argue among man. Haha, such is the problems of religions.
My Turkish, Lebanese, Arab friends who are all Christians use "Allah" to mean God. No one gets confused.

I guess Malaysian politicians must be outstandingly dim species who can be confused by usage of the word Allah. We obviously need better quality policitians and enforment officers.

Yes if this was the Quran that was confiscated, this would have been an international incident and there will be fatwas out left right and centre to kill infedils.

That my friends are how Islamic "munafiq" (hypocrites) work. They claim to talk and know about Islam but in reality they know very little.

Religious authorities and parties in Malaysia are so far away from true Islam, its like the difference between a donkeys nose and arse!

Islam talks about pretenders with forked tongue. Look at Najib talk about 1Malaysia when his minions do all the dirty work. See Islam for these buggers are only a means to an end. Its just a tool for them to strengthen their position as a political party.

So are we going to believe what these people say that somehow Malaysian Muslims will be "confused" by a Malay bible ? Everyone knows that in the Middle East everyone uses the word "Allah" to mean God. And I am very sure Bibles in various Middle Eastern languages use "Allah" as well. Have the Muslim there been confused ? Maybe Malaysian Muslims are inferior bunch with so little willpower that they get swayed so easily.

Has anyone wondered that its not Christians and their Bible ? Its the Malays themselves who are wrong ? In defending their religion, they are causing more harm than good. Rest assured articles like this will be published overseas and projecting Islam in bad light.

Thats right, all this religious persecution drive shows is how tolerant Malaysia really is.

AK
It's silly to ask what you will address God as, on Judgement Day. Are we assuming that you will be presented in front of him for interrogation? Nope, it will be swift (as speech and mind will no longer work there).

There is only the spiritual being, without the physical body that used to rendered us senses. We might not even be "seeing", "hearing" and "sensing" the way we did....

To assume that we need even to address God is sure an earthly presumption...

I for one will not be too bothered about how to address Him. To me, the question is insignificant.
To recap and agree with most of the comments.... The term "Allah" is more of cultural (or geographical) usage in languages THERE (Mid-Eastern or elsewhere), rather than religious. It might even precede Abrahamic era.

The logic is already clear.

As for the ban, it only shows how little faith the Malaysian Government (or religious authority) has towards the maturity of believers here in Malaysia. Nothing more... unless patency is at play here :D
or copyright?
lsek,

"It's silly to ask what you will address God as, on Judgement Day. Are we assuming that you will be presented in front of him for interrogation? Nope, it will be swift (as speech and mind will no longer work there)."

Interesting theory. I don't know if you are a Christian but if you say that to Christians who know what is written in the Bible, they will tell you to read Matthew 12:36-37; Romans 14:11.

You should read them to at least know that they know what they are talking about.
Although I prefer to be neutral in this matter, I'm afraid I have to agree that the relevant authority is being too defensive on the issue of the word usage. The only thing I remembered about the exclusive rights in Islam involved only the monotheistic tenets (aqidah tauhid) of Islam, which could be protested against should that exclusive rights be violated. Apart from that and a few other exclusive rights, the rest are inclusive, which could be tolerated and adapted to circumstance. The God's name wasn't one of the exclusive rights though.
We surely don't want to be like the orthodox Jews, in which even the name of God cannot be uttered, only read silently. For Muslims, remember the God doesn't favor those who do things in excess.
azizikhan,

To quote you, "And I am very sure Bibles in various Middle Eastern languages use "Allah" as well."

If the Bibles in the Mid-East countries are in Arabic and other languages local to the Mid-East, of course, the word "allah" will be in their Bibles.

Here in Malaysia, they are the ones who are saying that "allah" is word in the Malay language. But, are the Malays saying that "allah" is a Malay word?
jlkow, There are many places in the Bible where the Name is clearly mentioned but none can be more convincing than that that is mentioned in Mark 15:34, Matthew 27:46, They appear to confirm what is mentioned in Genesis 1.1 (Hebrew text).
Soondar, my brother, you are correct. You surprised me. You can even quote Scriptures. I salute you for your open-mindedness.
Right, need we dispute over what to call GOD?
Now dear sir, if you would kindly open the Bible to Luke 11:2, you'll see why I call him "FATHER."
Salam!
jlkow, thank you sir for your reply. No sir, we do not have to dispute over such issues. Thank you sir. Salam.
"Know the tersurat, understand the tersirat".

And yes, it's just a theory without practical implication.... None of us will know except when the time comes.

However, please bear with me when I say that "words"... it's a very inefficient way to communicate (though its emergence had propelled humanity to become the most "successful" species on the planet).

So, no matter how fluent we are, we can never express our thoughts nor feelings nor aspiration etc... as perfectly as we wanted, NOR can we assure the receiving end(s) understand 100% what we wanted to express.

So, it's a theory to say that "words" in scripture is merely a metaphor... to better communicate to humanity the "idea" of what the day of reckoning will be like... that we will have to explain all our justifications for all our deeds, regardless of the means of communication.

It's merely a theory. Back to the topic.... the term "God" is more cultural rather than religious. And rose by any name smells as nice (or has thorn)...

Peace.
To soondar.

I'm as impress as jlkow.

You don't just speak, but give weight to your words as well.

Peace.
azizikhan,

I'm not sure if you are Muslim or not but if you are, I salute you for your comments.

I have many True Muslim friends and they never made any remarks that can hurt anyone so do we who are not muslim.

In fact that is what we want in this country if we really want to progress as 1 Malaysia, a multi racial and multi religious country with one common goal which is to maintain peace and harmony among the people with different background.
Sorry, can I just...

If we are just a spec in the Universe, would God care how we address the?

sorry to interrupt, but i'm getting quite abit confused right here.

they; those ministers and the gomen's dogs who dont even practise what is being preached in their own religion (one must not consume alchohol and adulteries) now suddenly want to so call "protect" their religion by confiscating the Bible just because they contain one word used in their own Quran?

what is this? a joke? they themselves dont even respect their own religion but when they feel other people had offended their religion, they start making a big fuss out of it.

Dear Malaysians, please cool down.Each of you come up with your own points to back up your arguments. Its better if we ask the "tuan punya badan" how we should address him. Just summon God to High Court and listen to what God thinks others should call him.Can this be done?.

Apparently, we all had argued enough abt each others religion til we got nothing left to say anymore. So, all have decided to go back to basic which is how to address the God.Then the arguments will start all over again til it is back to the basic. This is a never ending story in Msia.

February 2010

  • SUN
  • MON
  • TUE
  • WED
  • THU
  • FRI
  • SAT
  •  
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28