Singapore in Deep Recession: Time for expatriates in Singapore to plan their exit
Singapore has always been a darling of the massive hedge funds and of the western capitalistic empire. This tiny island state has always been portrayed as the "beacon of democracy" in the east, with the hope that other Asian countries will
buy into the false promises of capitalism.
As such, the western world had poured billions of dollars into Singapore over the last 50 years in order to create this "Singaporean Economic Miracle" that so many westerners and Singaporeans are so arrogant of.
The Singapore government has also served its masters well.
Its docks served as the lifeline for the American convoys during both the Korean and Vietnam war. Desker Road, the "rest and relaxation" center for American sailors and GIs alike.
These events also explains the rapid development of Sinagpore in its early years despite a complete lack of natural resources. In fact, some academicians in Singapore have shown how significant this was in the book below.
The ugly truth is that Singapore "prospered" from the massacre and suffering of hundreds of thousands of innocent men, women and children in Korea and Vietnam for decades in the 50s, 60s and 70s by the American and the western "democracies".
The Singapore government have never acknowledge this fact, always insisting that the economic "miracle" was their own ingenuity. As such, the young generation of Singaporean have developed similar arrogance, devoid of any humility and
gratitude to those of whose suffering and blood they have now benefited from.
The Newly Industrialising Economies of East
Routledge; 1 edition (1997)
Language English
ISBN-10: 0415097495
ISBN-13: 978-0415097499
(http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DjKBjuj2ktEC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=impact+of+vietnam+war+on+singapore&source=web&ots=BNFm6gsbyA&sig=3xigtwWn0a70gJbQ6xkjdzH1A6M&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=7&ct=result)
As those of us in the finance world knows, it allowed the hedge funds to use its financial centre in Shenton Way to devastate the other Asian Economics during the attacks by hedge funds on the Asian currencies and stock markets in the 1997
Asian Financial Crisis. Many older Malaysians will still remember how CLOB was used to attack the KLSE and the Malaysian ringgit at the height of the crisis as well.
Singapore was also used as the base to attack the Hang Seng index, an attack that was only defeated in the end when China threw its weight and huge foreign reserves firmly behind the Hong Kong dollar. This led to a frosty spell in relations between China and Singapore that has never really thawed completely since. That is also why the Olympic flame came to Malaysia and not Singapore.
These attacks caused massive political and social upheavals in the whole of Asia. Suharto was overthrown, Indonesia's financial and political system collapsed and the Chinese Indonesians were raped and murdered, their beheaded heads tied to motorcycles and paraded throughout cities, their homes and business torched to the ground. Those who survived fled to Malaysia and Penang in particular for refuge.
This was the price paid for "democracy" as prescribed by the International Monetary Fund. One wonders why they don't take their own medicine now, bailing out all their financial institutions and giant companies like General Motors, Chrysler and the lot. Speaks volumes for transparency, "free market" and "accountability".
South Korea suffered hugely as well. Well established "undemocratic" chaebols" dismantled and once successful Korean industrial giants become bankrupt and was
taken over by western companies like General Motors. Many Korean men who become unemployed and could no longer support their families were driven to suicide, jumping off buildings and skyscrapers in Seoul.
The same would have happened to Malaysia if not for the decisive and far sighted vision and courage of one man, Mahathir. One man who was willing to be the "pariah", internationally and domestically, in order to protect his country and fellow Malaysians. This is the mark of a true statesman, leading the defense of the country at the fore in full sight of the enemies guns, unlike others who hides behind the US State Department, IMF, Hindraf and other NGOs like BERSIH and claiming to be the saviour of the people while instigating riots to divide and rule all at the same time.
Not many Malaysians realised how close we were to the precipice of economic and political chaos that would have set back our social, political and economic development by at least 30 years and led to the financial and political
colonisation of our country and its people via the International Monetary Fund and their cronies.
We would also have had a puppet leader installed, the likes of Thaksin Shinawatra that have been ousted for massive corruption in Thailand and who is now a convicted criminal on the run.
Many countries in South East Asia still remain under the yoke and control of the IMF today as a result of the Asian Financial Crisis.
Thanks to the hard work, courage and expertise of the Bank Negara staff and the National Economic Action Council, Malaysia was saved from ruin. The fiscal easing policy implementation and capital controls were described as "suicidal" by IMF and the world financial gurus like Warren Buffet, George Soros and the lot.
Today, those with enough insight and humility in the financial world have acknowledged the wisdom of Malaysian leaders and Bank Negara. We see the strength of our financial system and economy from their hard work 10 years ago even up to today, as we continue to have positive economic growth in the last three financial quarters of 2008 of 7.1%, 6.7% and 4.7% respectively while "great" economies like US, UK and Singapore slides into full recession.
In fact, Malaysia is still projected to have at least 3% of growth in 2009 by the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research.
Strangely enough, our own "kampung" experts were correct and not only did we got out of the financial crisis without any external IMF loans, the same policies are now adopted throughout the western world as they seek to escape drowning themselves in the biggest financial downturn in the history of capitalism, of their own making from greed and unbridled "creative" financial practices and creative accounting.
Throughout the turmoil 1997, Singapore was the only country in Asia whose currency and stock market was never actively attacked in the same manner by the huge western hedge funds.
Unashamedly, the Singapore government have always claimed in the mass media that their economic "resilience" was due to "sound economic policy" and a "fully democratic government" which is completely "transparent" and "free from corruption".
The truth is that Singapore is nothing more than a puppet to the "masters of the world", run as a dictatorship by a single family and their cronies.
What is the evidence?
Well, the evidence is coming. As the masters are struggling to survive themselves, the favoured sons are now left to fend for themselves. This includes individuals like Thaksin and Anwar, and countries like Singapore. We will now see truly how good the Singaporean government is in dealing with a REAL financial crisis without any crutches from its masters.
We will see how transparent and meritocratic the government really is.
We will also see how "great" Singapore really is without the hundreds of thousands of expatriates that are the actual innovators and drivers of growth for the Singaporean economy, industry and academic excellence, all lured by the
strong Singapore dollar.
Singapore was the first country in Asia to be in recession with three quarters of negative growth in 2008. In fact, this happened in September 2008 but was not widely publicised. The government has begun fiscal easing policies and a massive stimulus package is being planned. The exact same copy-cat policies that we implemented in 1997 by Malaysia.
The Singapore recession is so severe that for the first time in many years, the Singapore Monetary Authority is now adopting a "weak Singaporean dollar" policy in order to try to stimulate export in a rapidly deflating global economy.
I will not be surprised to see the Singapore dollar to continue
depreciating until it reaches a parity with the Malaysian ringgit in 2009, just like what has happened to the Euro and British pound.
People would have said that you were crazy if you had said that 1 Euro will be worth 1 British Pound a year ago. However, that is the reality today.
Foreign Exchange Converter
http://finance.yahoo.com/currency-converter
The economic downturn will have a devastating impact for Singapore due to its unique demographics in its population. The government has remain steadfast to date in defending the government policy of encouraging immigration of
professionals from other country. This really is the key of its success.
However, the underlying disaffection of the native Singaporean towards "foreigners" and "permanent residents" had remain strong throughout these years of growth, restrained only by the argument of "the wider public good" and "creating a bigger cake" for all Singaporeans to share. However, the general
sentiment of intense jealousy seeing the expatriates enjoying the good life remains, especially in the middle and lower classes whom cannot even afford their own private property or car.
As job loses mount and the unemployment figures balloon, the government owned businesses and banks in Singapore will come under pressure to lay-off workers.
There is no doubt that the pragmatic government will start with unskilled workers first and work his way up the ladder.
Eventually, the government will have to choose between employing the expatriate, the permanent residence and the native Singaporean worker. There is no doubt who
will be "let-go" first, as we have seen from the sacking of two Malaysian born pilots in SIA whom have lived most of their adult life in Singapore in 2003 due to demands for better working conditions, as an example to the rest of the
Singaporean pilots who were thinking of dissent.
We will then also see how truly "meritocratic" Singapore is when it has to choose between the Singapore permanent residents and the native Singaporeans. Hopefully, the permanent residents would not have burnt all their bridges to their country of birth when the Singapore government decides to choose the later, as it rightly should, and lead the country into more economic ruin with the inevitable lost of foreign skilled and professional workers.
Regardless of the outcome, Singaporeans will learn to have some humility and face the reality that its success is heavily dependent on the goodwill and expertise of hundreds of thousands of non-Singaporean citizens as the recession deepens in Singapore.
Hidup Malaysiaku!!!
Saturday January 3, 2009
Singapore’s recession deepens
(http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/3/business/2933248&sec=business)
Singapore slips further into recession
January 2, 2009 - 2:21PM
(http://business.theage.com.au/business/singapore-slips-further-into-recession-20090102-78wj.html)
Singapore, in Recession, Ends Currency Gain Policy
(http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aCfJDzdRR1ls&refer=home)
Singapore slides into recession
Economy heavily dependent on exports to developed world is one of the first in
Asia to be
hit by global slowdown
Angela Balakrishnan
guardian.co.uk, Friday 10 October 2008 11.35 BST
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/10/creditcrunch-marketturmoil1)
Singapore’s recession this year may be the worst in its 43- year history
(http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a1zsowuHX_10&refer=home)
Singapore Asia’s first economy in recession
AFP Published:Oct 10, 2008
(http://www.thetimes.co.za/SpecialReports/USElections/Article.aspx?id=860598)
Singapore officially in recession
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7741086.stm)

Comments
I think this book is written by a Malaysian who dont like Singapore!!!
But generally speaking it is well worth reading. Thanks.
One other comment is that our "kampung boys" got us out of the economic troubles back in 1997 , no doubt deserve salutes but I have always thought that it was done out of no other alternative because there is so much that cannot be revealed to the IMF or else many in the political power of the day will be in for big big troubles themselves instead of Malaysia as the whole.
My last comment - I will dare to take the bet with you that Spore dollar will depreciate in its value to be in parity with our ringgit within 2009 as you claimed. Euros compared with British pound is in a different playing ground as compared to Spore / Malaysia - AnSoN
Please read my post carefully. Singapore was used as a base by the speculators and hedge fund managers, not that the country itself carried out the attacks.
That is a very big difference.
As for the rest of your questions, all I am going to say is read the following articles.
Asian rivals lock horns
Thursday, November 12, 1998
Published at 14:46 GMT
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/212820.stm)
The Hong Kong Currency Speculation Attack 1997-98
(http://efinance.org.cn/cn/PHDS/The%20Hong%20Kong%20Currency%20Speculation%20Attack%201997-98.doc)
Thank you.
Fair enough you should support your own country, but why do I get the feeling that underlying all this Singapore bashing is a strong feeling of jealousy and envy?
Quick question to us Malaysians: Do you think Vision 2020 will be achieved? There is only about 10 years to go.
I think we can always be humble and learn something from everyone... Don't you think that is the right attitude?
How can Malaysia have a GDP growth of at least 3% in 2009 when all the major components that makes up GDP is in the negative?
By their own admission Malaysia's exports have shrunk, add to this the price of rubber, tin, palm oil and crude oil have all dropped by more than 50%.
I am very very skeptical. Definitely, the situation is not as bad as Singapore but it is not as rosy as some people say it is.
Well, lets keep an eye out on the level of unemployment. The government can give out rubbery GDP numbers but they cannot hide the miseries associated with high unemployment.
If GDP can grow by at least 3% then the level of unemployment should drop.
If Malaysia is so clever and Singapore is in such deep sh*t, then very soon Singaporeans will be coming to work in Malaysia by their thousand and the sun will rise from the west.
When did you leave Singapore by the way? 1997? It is already 11 years man. Take a short trip there today! In the middle of your soothsaying recession that Singapore in in and see whether what you say is true!
I doubt Singapore's dollar will sink to Malaysian Ringgit's level come whatever year! The way our fools handle the economy now, you can wait till the cows come home! If BN loses KT, see how low our MR will be!
Your mention of what Indoneisna did to Chinese is a veil threat, a typiceal play by BN people to scare the sh_t our of the non-Malays to vote for them!
You may sound very knowledgeable in economics but you surely lack a sound perspective in many other areas!
World financial players can use any place to lauch their attacks on the economies of smaller and weaker nations! If they use Labuan are you saying our government is in cahoot with them?
What is Malaysia doing today? We can't attract brains so we attact cheap and unskilled labourers! Today we are flooded with such immigrants (legal and illegal) whereas Singapore has stolen from everywhere brains because they give them opportunities that Malaysia do not offer them!
If Singapore deprive non-citizens of job opportunities it is their right to do so, so will Malaysia in times of economic recession, send all immigrant workers back if we do not need them, so what?
Look at people and nations with a broader point of view to be successful in life! Do not waste your intellect, I believe you have it!
Cheers.
Let's forget S'pore and concentrate on our own Malaysia.
To me S'pore is always a parasite, kia su people.
We have our own problems to deal with and put all efforts to make Malaysia a better place to live.
I agree with some of the points raised in yur blog like SG now is in a bad recession, they are generally selfish ppl, only looking at their interest n the SG Govt. is allowing SG dollar to weaken. Certainly, SG dollar won't reach a point where it is on par with our Ringgit in 2009. I would be happy if our Ringgit does not depreciate from the present level against the SG dollar.
Singapore has been officially in recession since April last year. It means its economy started to shrink beginning Oct. 07. I have heard it over the news in SG tv. I think there is sufficient coverage in their media. The SG govt. is not democratic but definitely not dictatorial n run by a single family.
Why do you have to mention that SG benefitted from the sufferings of others during the Korean n Vietnam wars? At least they made full use of the unexpected gains. These gains cannot be better than our discovery of huge oil reserves within our continental shelf.
As far as I know, SG's relations with China soured tremendously because PM Lee insisted on visiting Taiwan before assuming the PMship from SM Goh, against strong advices from China not to proceed ahead. How do you know that the Olympic torch was not relayed in SG because China wasn't happy with SG being used as a base to speculate on the HS Index? Did Hu Jin Tao tell you about this?
I think we are unlikely to achieve any growth this year. Prices of Crude oil n crude palm oil have fallen by over 65% from their peaks. Exports to the US has fallen by over 20%.
Hidup Malaysia, mati rasuah!
In Business world, only the strongest survive. The alternative is to achieve win-win situation. Apply this to MAlaysia-Singapore relationship.
I wont deny that SIngapore is in deep recession and Malaysia cant run away from it. My friends in Malaysia cried after being retrenched...simply becos to much debt to settle...
I wont support Dr. M's policy simply because He should prevent it earlier instead of solving it later. I have strong believe that his action may have sacrificed something in our economy development, especially in FDI.
The very good fact is, we all think that we have solved the problem years ago, but FDI is still flowing out? Why?
How we made it through? Sacrificing lots of national reserve? Revenue from Oil? EPF? Think about it.
It can only mean two things.
One, you people are so out of touch with the reality in Singapore because you have never worked or lived in Singapore for more than a year before. or only mixed with the upper classes while you were there.
Two, you just like running Malaysia down.
Have a look at this article from the Singaporeans themselves.
Instead of just posting useless comments in CB to confirm your own misconceptions, you should explore the cyber-world a little and read what is actually happening in other countries as well.
Thank you.
The giant and the tiny red dot
Chee Siok Chin
11 Jun 07
Singapore is a tiny country less than 700 square kilometres and where just over four million people reside. Compare this with China's 1.3 billion people and a land area of over nine million square kilometers, and the question of what the island-nation can teach the world's most populated country comes to mind.
Yet, there has been no shortage of such advocates. Listen to what economist and strategist, Mr. Arjuna Mahendran, says about the matter:
"Singapore is a small country of 4.3 million people, and is very efficiently run by a government of competent technocrats. It is considered a role model for other Asian countries in the field of urban planning. China’s leaders starting with the late Deng Xiao Ping used Singapore as a model to fashion the development of Shanghai and other urban centers."
India is also jumping in. Mahendran points out that "India is using Singapore’s expertise to re-develop her major cities" as well as those in Indonesia, Australia, the Philippines, Thailand and even the Middle East.
There is no doubt that Singapore is an extraordinarily influential city-state. It is often seen as a model of economic success by not only its neighbours, but also beyond.
Rich government, poor people
The economic success that Singapore often boasts of, however, is overstated. The real wealth lies with the ministers who have recently increased their salaries to between 1.5 million to 2 million US dollars year. Before this increase, ministers in Singapore were already the highest paid public servants in the world.
Whilst the island's leaders increased their already inflated salaries, however, the General Household Survey showed that the average household monthly income for the 30 percentile of lowest wage earners dropped by an average of 12 per cent.
At the same time, the top 10 percentile of households saw an increase of almost 15 per cent in their incomes.
The Gini Coefficient had increased from 0.49 to 0.522 from the year 200 to 2005, making income disparity in the country one of the highest in the world.
The question of whom all this economic success benefits necessarily arises. In truth its economic policies serve only to benefit the rich whilst those living in need are told that welfare should be treated like a dirty word.
The elderly are told to work beyond their retirement age and for less pay if they do not have enough money to see them through their remaining years.
The Peoples' Action Party (PAP) has been so successful in propagating its non-welfarism policy that Singaporeans think it is perfectly all right when see elderly women and men cleaning public toilets, collecting empty cans and cardboard boxes to sell, and going from table to table hawking packets of tissue at food centres.
Dependent thinking
This lack of compassion and conscience arise due to the fact that the local media have been hijacked by the ruling party. Newspapers, magazines, television and radio networks are controlled by the government.
This is the reality. The "success" the Singapore Government boasts about is attained at the cost of the freedoms, rights and dignity of its people.
The legal system is used to silence dissent; countless civil lawsuits and criminal prosecution have been successfully brought against opposition members.
Draconian laws have been enacted to ensure that power of the ruling party is deeply entrenched and prevails. Laws that prohibit public gatherings, protests, speaking to public audiences, producing political films and the use of summary judgments in defamation suits are just some of the regulations that serve to punish those who are deemed as hazards to the PAP's hold on authority.
Even the police force have been brainwashed to believe that they are personal protectors of members of the PAP.
Less authoritarian?
When compared to countries is Asia such as Burma, Cambodia, China, Vietnam and Laos, Singapore appears to be less authoritarian and less audacious in the way it deals with freedom fighters.
But the PAP's tactics are no less effective in curbing human rights and quelling any perceived threats to its power.
The situation that we face in Singapore is no less difficult. Politicians and democracy advocates have been sued, bankrupted, run out of the country and jailed in our struggle for democracy, social justice and human rights.
Teacher of the unfree world
But what has this Singapore-style government got to do with the world's Goliath?
It has been reported that China's former leader, Deng Xiaoping had openly expressed particular admiration for Singapore’s approach to "social order" as the best blueprint for the rapid development of China’s own cities. By the 1980s the Chinese Communist leaders, tired of the Western notion of urbanism, were also beginning to embrace the Singapore model.
Former president, Jiang Zemin is also an admirer of Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew. According to Hong Kong's Ming Pao newspaper, Jiang told Lee during their meeting that he admired him for his role as Singapore's elder statesman.
The economic blueprint for any country cannot be designed in isolation of political and social development. The Singapore model has shown that economic success cannot be achieved without the suppression of rights and basic freedoms.
China's human rights record is drawing much criticism and attention from democratic societies. Sanctions, resolutions and outcry by governments and NGOs affects the Chinese Government more than it cares to recognise or admit.
The Singapore model on the other hand draws little criticism much less affirmative action from these similar bodies. One reason is because it endears itself to Western multinational corporations by creating an environment highly beneficial to such foreign businesses but, as I have pointed out, with devastating results on the locals.
It also placates the West by making soothing noises of being committed to transparency and the rule of law, but in reality practicing the opposite. This creates the illusion of legitimacy for the government.
Unfortunately, this falsehood has either been overlooked or accepted as fact by the international community.
Worryingly, countries like Taiwan and Russia are picking up a thing or two about how to undermine democracy while appearing to supporting it.
Taiwan's presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou from the Kuomintang Party had cited Singapore as a model for Taiwan. He said "Singapore is different from us (Taiwan) as its emphasis is not on democratisation. Nevertheless, it is professional, corruption-free and efficient, which is worth our learning."
A country cannot stifle democracy without seriously violating basic human freedoms. Yet, Ma looks to this city-state as an example for one of Asia's most established democracies.
Russia's current strongman Vladimir Putin is said to be looking at Lee's model of promoting economic development in isolation of the democratisation process.
Ousted former prime minister of Thailand, Thaksin Shinawatra, ran the country using the Singapore model. Analyst Shawn Crispin wrote that in Thaksin's public speeches and weekly radio addresses, the former Thai leader had frequently invoked Singapore's style of governance. It proved unpopular with Thailand's democracy and freedom activists, which eventually led to his downfall.
The dangerous truth
Since it opened its doors to foreign trade and investments, the role that China plays in the world's economy has hugely increased. If it does a Singapore-type expansion, there will be a heavy price to pay for all involved, both politically as well as economically.
There is no doubt that Singapore is often seen as a model of economic success. The dangerous truth is that its governance presents a threat to democracy all over the world.
If a few countries begin to import, even in part, Lee Kuan Yew's style of governance, the struggle against tyranny is in for a rough and prolonged ride.
Chee Siok Chin is a member of the SDP's Central Executive Committee.
(http://sgforums.com/users/64266/posts?page=17)
After all, research is free.
By samcwpen, 4-Jan-2009
Vision 2020 ? Is it still valid and relevant ? Hahah...
Talk about dead chicken kick the ricepot lid. hahaha.
Have a look at this link and like I said, please do some research before posting comments to just justify your own misconceptions.
You can extend the "life" of your car after 10 years, but you have to pay and pay again.
Pay and pay again. How would you like to apy for the same car twice, three times..??!!!
Once you're here: Buying a used car in Singapore
http://www.expatsingapore.com/content/view/1609
samcwpen,
The link provided for Dodger's comments is rather useful. Those are information and facts, ever scrutinized as to why rules and regulations are being put up..?? why do you need to pay and pay after 10 years for the same car or why COE is implemented at the first place...?? Unlike M'sia, SG is so small.. Unlike M'sia, public transportation services are like clockworks, unlike M'sia, SG traffic congestions are manageable. IF there are no such R&R for COE on a 10 years vehicle, you will see unsafe, old car polluting the already small island, without CEO roads will be heavily congested and riding a bicycle would be a faster option then driving...We have 6 cars in our household... Its cheap, its convenient but our roads are atrocious. So what's the point. Until we have a better public transportation ie like SG and CH (Switzerland) I wldn't mind giving up my precious cars....